torsdag 6 september 2012

nOne of the Two: Idiot of Love


Intimacy of desire and eroticism of drive: separate instances intertwined in the idea of love. Hence, from a displacement of desire and drive, love emerges as spiritual, religious, idealist and mystic concept. The knowledge of love is awareness of a narrative of one's desire for the enjoyment of the other; retracing the desire at the void of being or the force of life, the Freudian drive. Libido. Any desire is wish and fantasy. Always at work, indeed in manic-erotic obsession the idea of love, of loving beloved person is more than just desiring the agalma (Lacan's objet petit a). The compulsory instance of this misperceived identification of the fantasy of beloved with the actual person want-to-be story of "true love". The problem of love-idealism of the Two is however posed by psychoanalytic practice of love-transfer, which renders love as pure altruism; disinterested to profit on the economy of desire – but to profit on money – whereas the previous animates the idea of the love of Two. Yet, there is the idea of Love of Two that cannot be disregarded as illusion: the idea of One; impossible idea, as of the Two becoming One in Love there is no-one of the two left. This is an operation that annihilates the subject, for good or bad. Love idealism is then the idea of absolute void, an annihilation of Being. And the One is impossible to make "in love". What truth is now revealed in this dialectical movement of reasoning? The truth that One is always already One-self. So, why make one self an idiot of Love?


Recommended reading: J. Lacan, Encore.

Inga kommentarer:

Skicka en kommentar